Author: prioritylegalcla

law

Today, a dramatic next-move in its United Kingdom anti-fracking campaign, saw Friends of the Earth escalate the fight against the Environment Agency (EA) granting of a Lancashire fracking permit to Cuadrilla, to the High Court. The environmental lobbying group is challenging the company’s fracking rights at its Preston New Road site despite the EA’s last-minute’ greenlighting of Cuadrilla’s shale gas extraction in July 2018.

This was a surprise move, given that public support for fracking had fallen to an all-time low of around 14%, according to a 2017/18 Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) survey. At the time, the energy minister, Claire Perry, justified the decision by citing the importance – and key strategic role – of shale gas in the country’s future energy mix as a critical lever for energy security.

Friends of The Earth has said that EA has failed in its duty to ensure that adequate technology and infrastructure are in place to sufficiently mitigate against negative environmental impact during the extraction process. While the EA has claimed that “Gold Standard” regulation would make the fracking safe, the campaigners believe that the EA’s refusal to consider new, safer, technologies such as a technique called electrocoagulation’, when it issued a permit to Cuadrilla, is a dereliction of its responsibilities to the people and the natural environment of the United Kingdom.

The High Court challenge addresses both the case to proceed, and what additional operational and governance requirements should be stipulated within the permit framework should that permission to proceed stand. Key to the concerns raised is the fact that the government appears to have de-prioritised its renewable energy programme in favour of wide-scale fracking. This disregards the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report recommendation that renewable energy needs to supply 70-80% of the United Kingdom’s energy by 2050 to achieve critical identified climate change mitigation and adaptation measures.

Another concern outlined by Friends of the Earth about this decision to support a whole new fossil fuel industry, is that there appears to be little ability to implement effective monitoring and implementation of environmental impact mitigation measures. In fact, at the Preston New Road site where fracking commenced in October 2018, the local community have already endured 36 small earthquakes in the three weeks following fracking commencement.

Tony Bosworth, Friends of the Earth spokesperson stated his fears that the government aimed to roll out fracking but appeared unable to properly regulate activity at even this one site. He entered a plea for a reconsideration of renewables. This legal battle will be watched closely by Chester solicitors and others in the region.

While it is laudable that the government is focused on securing Britain’s electricity supply for future generations, energy sector experts the world over are adamant on the requirement for countries to develop a well-rounded energy mix that looks at sustainable base-load supply through environmentally responsible technologies. Shale gas extraction through fracking is globally contentious and has met stringent public opposition in many countries from first world leaders such as United States to emerging markets such as South Africa.

Until energy sector players can irrefutably demonstrate their commitment to undertaking the extraction of this natural shale gas in the most environmentally responsible method available, impediments to the operations of fracking companies – such as todays Friends of the Earth challenge in Lancashire – may continue to be a regular part of our social and political landscape. A ruling on the Cuadrilla matter is due imminently.

law

Working in a British Legal firm is coordinated with higher profits but also poses a lot of stress and problems in the workplace. Being able to work in a legal/law firm has advantages but has risk and disadvantages. The advantages of working in the city’s top legal firms are that low income and profit were never a problem because the longer you work, the bigger your profit and richly rewarded. But the higher the profit you may get, the higher the risk of stress and poor mental health would be expected.

Staff’s wellbeing is one of those working environment issues that could undoubtedly lose all sense of direction in the manner of working together. Also, law offices such as Manchester law firm options maybe haven’t constructed a reputation throughout the years for being irrational and risky. In any case, there’s a common observation that to embark on the law is to expect extended periods of time and a lot of diligent work. Technology also plays a part in growing profits in a legal firm but at the same time, puts an individual in a tight situation. There are things that we should look out for in terms of every individual’s welfare.

Some of the problems that may happen in a legal firm workplace are that a lot of workers are under a lot of stress due to long working hours. Stress contributes to poor performance and poor mental health and the welfare of the people because they don’t have the time to relax, loosen up and recuperate of all the workplace stress. New technology is also helpful but at the same time interferes and hinders the capacity of the worker to handle the heavy workload and task at hand. In the line of work of the lawyers and staff at the legal firm, work will always come first even arriving at personal spaces.

Legal firms show indications that they take the wellbeing of the staff’s physical and emotional state very seriously perhaps because of the stressful environment a legal firm has. To support the welfare and wellbeing of the staff, they need to provide means to become stronger and resilient which is beneficial to both person and the firm. The following would be a good start in recuperating with legal firm problems:

  • In times of problems, every individual in the firm must support and help those who need guidance and assistance, never manage a problem on your own.
  • Always keep things in the right perspective. Put your mindset to your goal.
  • Greater appreciation of work-life balance
  • Prioritize the mental health of every staff in the firm. Introduce mental health programs.

To create a workplace environment that every staff would always feel the encouragement and genuine support is one of the higher chances that every individual in that firm would lessen their stress. It is important to look out for the welfare of every individual in your workplace. Every hard work deserves a great support. Every individual must always remember that never get too emotional with your work, keep in mind that it’s just a job, not your life. One way or another, it should never affect your health in any means. The success of every job depends on its worker. Never intend to abuse those people who dedicated their lives in their jobs.

drink drive

It is normal for people to get speeding tickets when they drive past specified limits on highways. It is not a serious offence, but it can hurt you financially. It is not just a matter of coughing up money from your wallet, and it also raises the insurance amount of your car. What is worse is that at stake is a driver’s track record of driving.

Every driver wants to keep his driving history as neat and clean as possible therefore options for speeding tickets should be looked into very carefully. In the US there are different options available for those who receive a speeding ticket. Heavy fines hurt people financially which is why the government has proposed alternative possibilities for speeding ticket holders to be able to reduce their heavy penalties.

The most popular way of reducing the fine is by working for no profit organisations engaged in community services. These services reduce the amount of punishment depending on the number of hours the driver opts for them. It is not just picking up garbage as one can choose to serve in a nursing home, or teach in a community school. As described above, money earned is in proportion to the number of hours put in and are deducted from the amount of the speeding offence solicitors fees for the services to the driver.

The option of offering community services instead of paying a fine amount for speeding ticket is best suited for those who are unemployed and students. Culprits of speeding pay off their fines by doing something worthwhile for the society which is appreciated by all. Those who opt for such a scheme also get the benefit of such speeding not mentioned in their track record thus keeping their insurance rates down.

At times, a driver who has received speeding ticket thinks that community service or even speeding awareness courses is a menial process, and it is better to pay fine, but it is often not the right thinking. Opting to contribute to community service serves its purpose well and leads to character improvement of the driver while at the same time helping him financially. It also saves from the extra financial load that speeding ticket put on the driver.

Opting for the driving school is another way to pay off the speeding ticket fine, but in this option, one has to pay the fees of the school. This option is costlier, but many opt for it as it as they consider it better than doing community service and it also helps to keep their insurance rates down.

According to the statistics teenagers with new driving, licenses form the largest group to whom speeding tickets are issued. The option to escape from fines putting in hours doing community service has been designed keeping in mind such kids. 30 to 40 hours of unpaid social service in a hospital or for cleaning rooms waives off the fine amount.

While it might appear to be irrational, the more typical divorce turns into, the more confused it gets. One may expect that because about portion of the present first relational unions end in divorce (and around 60 per cent of second relational unions) the law, the procedure, even the result would end up institutionalised, unsurprising also. However, nothing could be more remote from reality when it comes to enforcing a financial court order.

Finances rapidly rise as the most convoluted issue facing a divorcing couple, and the present funds can be significantly confounded. Quite a while back, ordinary individuals did not claim shared assets and investment opportunities, make mixed families, or aggregate mountains of MasterCard and home loan obligation.

Father went to work, and Mom remained home to bring up the kids. Life was basic, families were necessary, and divorce, albeit uncommon, was frequently extremely basic.

Courts tend to manage in support of ladies in divorce; it’s only reality. So men should be additional watchful before the proceedings to ensure they don’t lose their shirt all the while. Here are a couple of tips for the men to remember financially speaking.

1) Separate financial From Your Ex Immediately – This is a crucial hint that numerous men won’t do quick enough. There are a lot of feelings that are involved with the two individuals during a divorce. Warmed contentions are had, explanations are made to one another that can’t be reclaimed.

Ordinarily, the spouse will settle the score with the man by spending everything on the Visas, spending the savings, and so forth…No one but you can know whether your ex is equipped for this sort of conduct, yet you likewise never know. Isolate your credit instantly.

2) Establish Your Credits Immediately – It’s imperative to build up your own particular acknowledge at the earliest opportunity so you can begin your current life on firm financial grounds. Have your finances been joint so far?

Begin establishing credit and get your own particular separate fiscal balances at the earliest opportunity.

3) Learn All You Can Before having To A Lawyer – This is crucial, as we as a whole know legal advisers are costly. Each bone-headed inquiry you asks shall be met with a grin since he knows he’s charging you continue to answer them.

It’s a smart thought to realise precisely what’s in store, what proceedings are, and how to design successfully for each progression. You will spare a considerable measure of cash when you manage your legal adviser.

 

While we all grew up in court dramas and believe that the court is where the plot is, the truth is a bit banaler. Most personal injuries are handled, for example, as personal injuries. The lawyers try every attempt to reach an agreement first; if you can not reach it, the argument goes to trial. This article will explain how the personal injury lawyer can make your decisions and how you can be sure that you will be paid if you reach an agreement.

Contingency Fees:
In many countries, offending lawyers are often paid with contingency fees. A contingency fee is a percentage of the amount of the settlement or the amount of a court order in the case of a judgment. It can be up to 25% if the litigation is made in the discovery phase, deposits, and citations when requested, and the judge decides what evidence is admissible. Contingency fees are a form of compensation used without claims for victory. No charge, in which the injury lawyer (also known as solicitors personal injury services) does not charge attorney fees IF the case is NOT won.

Examine your withholding agreement:
Before signing a Damage Request Agreement, look for clauses that may not be of interest to you. For the holders’ agreements without earning any fee claims, even if they are not charged legal fees, they may be charged other expenses, such as medical experts.

Another warning signal is permission to fix the case without your consent. If the owner’s agreement allows the lawyer to finalize a scheme without his approval, even if he agrees to the withdrawal, then he may find himself dissatisfied with the specific terms of the agreement. If you eliminate this provision, you will have the opportunity to review the terms of the agreement and ask the lawyer to conduct new negotiations if necessary.

Clarification as to whether the agreement establishes that the amount of contingent liabilities of the attorney is calculated as a percentage of the gross or net value of the settlement amount. Ideally, you should deduct the rate from a percentage of the net settlement, that is, after deducting your medical expenses.

Receive your billing check:
If you win an agreement, it will probably be easy if the losing party is insured. Simply notify the insurance company of the agreement and send it to your lawyer’s law firm. The examination is done with the lawyer (or signature) and the client, so in most cases, you will be asked to help the examination before depositing it in the lawyer’s fiduciary account. Be sure to receive a copy of the check for your own documents, even if you do not need to confirm the check.

Lawsuit

Kevin Garnett, a retired Minnesota Timberwolves and Boston Celtics star is suing an accountant together with his firm for professional negligence. The basketball star is alleging the accountant of aiding a wealth manager steal money amounting to £58.74 m.

The federal malpractice lawsuit alleges Michael Wertheim, an accountant based in Kentucky and Welenken CPAs of enabling Charles Banks of Atlanta of defrauding the star. This was in businesses that Garnett and Banks shared an interest and were involved in.

There is clear professional negligence portrayed as the lawsuit shows. It contends the accountant of possessing actual knowledge that the manager, Banks was helping himself to Garnett’s millions yet Wertheim did nothing about it.

As per the suit, Wertheim took instructions from Banks and for unknown reasons decided not to contact Mr Garnett. Wertheim prepared financial statements of the business interests the basketball star had. The accountant was even a registered agent for these companies Garnett chose to invest in. It is claimed that Wertheim had his name in the bank accounts holding Garnett money.

According to the suit, there were set budgets by Wertheim, who “worked in concert” with the manager Banks. The NBA all-star Garnett was urged to follow these budgets and was even on a budget.

The lawsuit states that Banks intentionally stole for many years the earnings as well as assets that belong to Garnett. The looting took place even during the many years Welenken and Wertheim offered their accounting services to the basketball star and his business interests.

A defence attorney, Greg Simpson, talking to the Star Tribune said he advised his clients to deny the allegations and they will “vigorously fight the lawsuit. The suit, which was filed in Hennepin County District Court initially was moved to U.S District Court in Minneapolis a few days ago.

Banks who was sentenced last year to 4 years for defrauding yet another former NBA star Tim Duncan, a retired San Antonio Spurs millions of dollars was not named as a defendant. Interestingly, in one of the San Antonio Spurs star’s deals with the wealth manager, Duncan said he was told of a partner who would be Garnett.

While Garnett’s lawyer, Mark Gaughan refused to explain why Banks was not a defendant, he did talk about the confidence they had in winning the suit. According to Gaughan, the matter will eventually be resolved in favour of Mr Garnett based on the facts of the lawsuit.

Mr Garnett, who retired with the Minnesota Timberwolves in 2016 is most definitely looking for a substantial compensation. For such act of professional negligence as that alleged by Mr Garnett requires highly qualified, experienced and committed attorneys. It might be helpful to seek knowledgeable ones for anyone who finds themselves in such a situation.